Virginia Nurse Practitioners: The Fight for Full Practice Authority

Search For Schools

*sponsored

Our ability to serve the community to our full extent is limited because we must find physicians who are willing to work with us…if our collaborating physician decides to stop working with us, then the clinics would immediately need to close and we would leave patients without any healthcare services.
Dr. Rebecca Sutter, George Mason University

[Please note that in April 2018, Virginia’s law was updated to allow greater autonomy for NPs with at least five years of full-time, clinical experience!]

While the United States is consumed by debates over how to combat the opioid addiction plight or how to get Americans insured, there’s a less-discussed crisis looming on the horizon: the shortage of primary healthcare providers. The American Association of Medical Colleges (2017) projected a shortage of between 40,800 and 104,900 physicians by 2030—a dire situation for a population which is living longer and grappling with rising rates of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other serious conditions. An expected shortage of this magnitude is startling, but there is one legislative solution which can relieve some of this pressure: granting nurse practitioners full practice authority (FPA) across the country.

In “restricted practice” states such as Virginia, nurse practitioners (NPs) are prevented from working autonomously to the full extent of their graduate-level training. In fact, NPs in the Old Dominion must not only have a “practice agreement” with a supervising physician to prescribe common medications, but they also are governed by duplicative regulatory structures. To elaborate, the Virginia Board of Nursing reports that both VA BoN and the local Board of Medicine oversee APRN practice. This redundancy is unnecessary given the abundance evidence that NPs provide safe, high-quality, and cost-effective healthcare. Furthermore, NP full practice authority is supported by a wide range of prestigious organizations, including the AARP, the National Governors Association, the Bipartisan Policy Center, the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and many other groups.

It’s important to note that many complex healthcare issues in Virginia require the collaboration of a team, including nurses, APRNs, physicians, and specialists. The problem is that laws in states such as Virginia, California, and Florida hinder the ability of these skilled healthcare professionals to work to the full extent of their training and abilities.

As of December 2017, NursePractitionerSchools.com has interviewed nearly 40 renowned NPs on their FPA views. In an interview with an exceptional NP professor from Virginia’s George Mason University, this article echoes the countless voices from “restricted practice” states, thus strengthening the case for nationwide FPA.

Interview with an Expert: Dr. Rebecca Sutter

Full practice authority would allow NPs in Virginia to practice to the full extent of their education and training, while creating more opportunities for patients throughout all parts of Virginia.
Dr. Rebecca Sutter, George Mason University

In December 2017, Dr. Rebecca Sutter of George Mason University weighed in with her thoughts on NP practice authority within Virginia. Please note that this interview has been lightly edited.

Conclusion: Full Practice Authority in Virginia?

Ask [state legislators] to be the voice of change that is needed for the future of the nurse practitioner profession and for patient access to quality healthcare.
Dr. Rebecca Sutter, George Mason University

More than two-thirds of Americans have visited a nurse practitioner for their primary care needs, and there are 9.2 million visits to NPs annually in the U.S. As a growing share of these healthcare professionals pursue a doctor of nursing practice (DNP)—the terminal degree in the discipline—why is there such a geographical discrepancy in clinical practice privileges? And why is this a problem?

Interestingly, the only groups that consistently lobby to prevent NPs from achieving FPA are physicians’ organizations, and denying NPs FPA leads to several issues. First, NPs in “restricted” or “reduced” practice states such as Virginia may be tempted to relocate to areas with more favorable laws. Second, NPs are sometimes the only healthcare professionals available, particularly in rural regions or other underserved areas; if these NPs can’t find collaborating physicians nearby, they may not be able to order specific diagnostic tests or effectively treat their patients. Lastly, the aforementioned looming healthcare provider shortage is real and imminent; if current trends continue, scores of vulnerable Americans won’t have access to primary care providers. In sum, Dr. Sutter and countless talented nurse practitioners around the nation agree: it’s time to lift the cumbersome limitations on autonomous NP practice in restricted states such as Virginia.

To join the fight, please check out NursePractitionerSchools.com’s FPA Toolkit, which provides scripts for NPs, students, and concerned citizens to reach out to state legislators.

Jocelyn Blore

Jocelyn Blore

Editor

Jocelyn Blore is the Managing Editor of NursePractitionerSchools.com. After graduating from UC Berkeley, Jocelyn traveled the world for five years as freelance writer and English teacher. After stints in Japan, Brazil, Nepal, and Argentina, she took an 11-month road trip across the US, finally settling into lovely Eugene, OR. When Jocelyn isn’t writing about college programs or interviewing professors, she satirizes global politics and other absurdities at Blore’s Razor (Instagram: @bloresrazor). Thank you for being interested.